Faculty of SITE Northern Territory University Flora & Fauna Survey Techniques
   
what is flora and fauna survey?
why survey?
factors to consider
preparing to sample
flora survey techniques
fauna survey techniques
mammals
reptiles and frogs
birds
invertebrates
fish
sampling considerations
analysing data
presenting data
 

Invertebrates - Terrestrial and Aquatic


The enormous variety of invertebrates requires a variety of sampling techniques. As with all fauna survey techniques, the aims and constraints of the survey will dictate which methods are used. It is important to note that it is relatively easy to trap large numbers of invertebrates in a short period, however, this means that a large effort is needed to sort, count and identify them back in the lab.

For ease of use, this summary of invertebrate sampling techniques is divided into two major groups:

Terrestrial
Aquatic


Terrestrialtop of page

There two major groups of terrestrial insects:
those that fly and those that don't.

This requires different methods of sampling:

for flighted insects - flight interception traps
for other insect types - ground and vegetation traps


Flight interception trapstop of page
These include

Impaction or sticky traps
Target group: most flying insects

Description: range of substrates (e.g. plates, dishes) coated in long-lasting glue. Efficacy of the traps can be increased by use of different colours, depending on target species. Traps are heavily affected by weather conditions and effectiveness decreases as surface becomes clogged with dust and insects. Insects are removed from trap using solvents.

back to flight interception traps

Light trap
Target group: nocturnal flying insects

Description: the basic light trap comprises an electric bulb, a white sheet as a reflective surface and a funnel to collect insects close to the light source. Many traps use ultra-violet globes as they attract a wider variety of insects. Weather conditions (temperature, windspeed and rain) have a major affect on trap catches.

back to flight interception traps

Malaise traps
Target group: Diptera (flies), Hymenoptera (wasps) and Lepidoptera (moths)

Description: a netting tent with one open side into which a small container is placed at the highest point. Insects flying or crawling through the opening move up the netting and are collected in the container. May be left for a number of days without checking.

back to flight interception traps

Pheromone traps
Target group: species specific

Description: based on the principle that sex pheromones of female insects can attract males over large distances. Typically a glass jar open at both ends with a sticky trap attached to the middle. A vial of insect pheromone is placed next to the sticky trap, which soaks up the pheromone and slowly releases it to the air.

back to flight interception traps

Suction traps
Target group: most insects, particularly aphids and aerial pests of agricultural crops.

Description: fixed or mobile engine-driven device that sucks insects into a fine mesh, which can then be collected in a container.

back to flight interception traps

Water traps
Target group: wide range of insects

Description: simple method based on a yellow pan (colour attracts insects) with vertical baffles placed above the ground. Detergent may be added to water to decrease surface tension of the water. Insects are attracted to container and simply drown in the water.


Ground and Vegetation trapstop of page

These include

Direct inspection
Target group: most invertebrates

Description: similar to active searches. A regular inspection of a specified area will enable sampling of a proportion of the obvious species present. Prior knowledge of invertebrate fauna is essential to be able to visually recognise species. There is a strong bias against cryptic species with this method.

back to ground and vegetation traps

Knockdown sampling
Target group: tree-dwelling invertebrates

Description: an irritant spray such as natural pyrethrin is applied using an engine-driven or knapsack mistblower high into the tree. A ground sheet or collecting basket is placed below the canopy to collected dead invertebrates.

back to ground and vegetation traps

Pitfall traps
Target group: ground-dwelling invertebrates (e.g. ants, beetles, spiders)

Description: consists of small metal, plastic or glass container sunk into the ground such that the rim is level with the soil surface. Mobile invertebrates fall into the trap and cannot escape. Trap can be filled with preservatives (usually mixture of ethanol and glycerine) or baits if intended to target certain groups. Trap diameter can vary with target group (small traps exclude larger invertebrates). Drift fences may be used to assist in sampling. Pitfall traps not suitable in wet conditions.

back to ground and vegetation traps

Shaking and beating
Target group: leaf beetles, weevils and Lepidoptera larvae

Description: a sheet or plastic cloth is laid out under the plant which is then shaken and beaten (don't be too cruel) and the dislodged invertebrates are collected quickly before they can escape.

back to ground and vegetation traps

Soil and litter samples
Target group: soil and litter dwelling species (e.g. spiders).

Description: a soil or litter sample from a set area or volume is collected and sieved to sample invertebrates. Water or heat may be applied to samples to stimulate activity.

back to ground and vegetation traps

Sweep nets
Target group: most invertebrates

Description: an inexpensive and commonly used means of sampling invertebrates from vegetation. The net is swung a set number of times through ground vegetation (grass and shrubs), while pacing. To prevent invertebrates escaping the mouth of the net must be closed as soon as sweeping is completed.

For more information
Additional reading

McEwen, P. (1997). Sampling, handling and rearing insects. In: Dent, D.R. & Walton, M.P. Methods in Ecological and Agricultural Entomology. CAB International, Oxon, United Kingdom.


Aquatictop of page

For aquatic invertebrates there are a range of sampling techniques available. You will already have encountered some information about these if you have studied or are studying SBI 506.
Techniques described here include

Dip-nets
Target group: benthic or pelagic invertebrates

Description: a mesh strip attached to a rectangular or triangular frame (with or without a handle). In running water, the net is placed on the stream bed and the substratum directly upstream is disturbed, causing organisms to flow into the net. In areas of low water flow, the dip-net is swept through the water (preferably through vegetation). This method is less quantitative then the Surber sampler, as it does not relate invertebrate density to an unit area of substrate.

back to Aquatic

Surber samplers
Target group: benthic invertebrates

Description: a rectangular quadrat to delineate sample area and a net into which the disturbed invertebrates are collected. This method is used in flowing water to assist in collecting.

back to Aquatic

Grab samplers
Target group: benthic invertebrates

Description: a portion of the substrate is removed using a range of implements. Most efficient when substrate particle size is less than 15 mm (pebbles). The total sample is placed in a container and invertebrates are sorted and identified back in the lab.

back to Aquatic

Suction samplers
Target group: benthic invertebrates

Description: similar to grab samplers in that a fixed portion of the substrate is removed by a suction device (usually hand driven). The total sample is placed in a container and invertebrates are sorted and identified back in the lab.

back to Aquatic

Colonisation samplers
\
Target group: mainly benthic invertebrates

Description: an artificial substrate is provided for invertebrates to colonise. This method allows a quantitative measure of abundance per unit area of substrate.

For more information
Please read

O'Connor, R. (1997).
Survey techniques for invertebrates. In SBI506 Readings

Tropical Savannas CRC top of page

Tropical Environmental Management Course Homepage
last updated by lrp@cdu.edu.au 6 August, 2004
© Copyright