In this topic we will address the challenge of providing food and other goods to our current world population and to nearly 9 billion people by 2050 by considering
Historically humans have depended on three main systems to produce their food, croplands, rangelands and fisheries.
There are two major ways in which agricultural production is achieved (i.e., two types of systems) industrialised and traditional. In this course we will focus mainly on industrialised agriculture, however, we will also consider traditional agriculture, because nearly half of the worlds people rely on traditional agriculture for their livelihood and most of their food.
There are a number of other approaches to agriculture that are practiced in developed countries that provide alternatives to the conventional or industrialised approach, such as organic farming and permaculture. Although these approaches often make a valuable contribution to sustainable agriculture we will not be considering this systems specifically, although the section on sustainable farming does cover most of these principles.
Read Pages 280 – 288 in Miller & Spoolman (2012) ensuring that the following questions are answered by your summary
The Earth's ability to feed the increasing population is another controversial topic in environmental issues. Reasons for this include different interpretations of current patterns of food production, the impact of agriculture on the environment and the uncertain role of technology.
Read Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 278 – 280 and answer the following questions:
Since 1950, most of the increase in agricultural production has come from increased yields per unit area of croplands using principles of the "Green Revolution" approach.
With Reference to Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 285 – 286 and 293 – 295 answer the following questions:
The high yielding varieties developed and introduced by the green revolution (GR) are known as "high responders". This means that they are capable of yielding more than traditional varieties if given optimum levels of fertilizer and water and protection from pests. However, under suboptimum conditions these varieties often produce lower yields than traditional varieties which are often more resistant to drought and local pests. This was particularly true of crop varieties developed by the original GR.
As a result GR farmers are forced into dependence on high levels of fertilizers and pesticides and often need to irrigate to obtain optimum yields. This dependence on expensive inputs can exclude peasant farmers from benefiting from the GR when it is these farmers and the people of developing nations that would benefit most from the increased food production. There is a considerable amount of foreign aid provided to make the technology of the GR available in developing countries, however, this can increase the dependence of rural areas on foreign aid.
The major difference between different approaches to agriculture, conventional, high tech, organic, traditional farming systems etc is the extent to which they effectively utilise and maintain ecosystem services.
Lets consider the value of ecosystem services to agriculture. We will primarily focus on the industrialized system, as this is what is primarily in operation in Australia.
To determine how much Ecosystem Services (ESS) are worth to agriculture we have to consider value in a number of different ways:
Let us now consider the loss of some specific ecosystem services as an illustration of one aspect of the value of these services.
Source: Australian Natural Resources Atlas
In addition to using ecosystem services, agricultural lands offer ecosystem services.
Ecological services provided by agricultural lands include
Economic services provided by agricultural lands include
Source Miller (2004)
There are three major ways in which agricultural production systems, particularly industrialized systems, affect the provision of ecosystem services. These are:
Land degradation is a decrease in the ability of land to support crops, livestock or wild species in the future as a result of natural or human-induced processes.
Soil erosion is the movement of soil components, especially topsoil, from one place to another, usually by wind, flowing water or both. This natural process can be greatly accelerated by human activities that remove vegetation from the soil. There is great concerned about the widespread extent of erosion because it lowers soil fertility (decrease in agricultural productivity) and can overload waterways with nutrients (i.e. water pollution).
Detrimental Effects of Agriculture |
---|
Biodiversity * Loss or degradation of habitat from clearing grasslands and forests and draining wetlands * Fish kills
Soil *Erosion *Loss of soil fertility etc |
Detrimental Effects of Agriculture | Ecosystem Services Affected |
---|---|
Biodiversity * Loss or degredation of habitat from clearing grasslands and forests and draining wetlands * Fish kills etc Soil |
* This large-scale impact affects all ecosystem services to some extent *Food Production |
There are a number of approaches that could be taken to increase food production and decrease the impact of agriculture on the environment. The major alternatives that have been suggested will be examined in this section. As you complete this section of the module think about the impact each of these approaches has on the ability of ecosystems to provide ecosystem services and we will come back to this point at the end of the section.
For centuries scientists and farmers have used traditional methods of selection and cross breeding to develop genetically improved crop strains and livestock.
Read the section on crossbreeding in Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 285-286 and answer the following questions:
Scientist have now taken the process of crossbreeding one step further and are using genetic engineering and other forms of biotechnology to develop new genetically improved strains of crops.
It is important to note that in this class we are not dealing with cloning, altering human DNA, stem cell research, genetic technology for medical procedures etc. We are strictly looking at the use of genetic engineering to produce new varieties of crops for agricultural production.
Genetic Engineering involves removing a gene from one species and inserting it into the DNA (genetic makeup) of another unrelated species to produce a beneficial genetic trait in the new genetically modified organism (GMO). Currently this technology has been applied to numerous crops to improve protection against pests (including insects, fungi and viruses), increase crop resistance to herbicides, decrease water use (i.e., increase drought resistance) and increase the nutritional value of crops. Refer to Table 3, for examples of types of genetically modified crops.
Controversy is growing over the use of genetically modified foods. GMOs are seen by advocates as a potentially sustainable way to produce higher crop yields and solve the world's food problems. However, critics are concerned about the negative environmental, human health and socio-economic effects of these so called "Frankenfoods"
Type of Genetic Improvement | Examples of Crops |
---|---|
Pest control |
Mainly Bt crops, which have the genes of a bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis inserted so the crop can produce toxins that deter and/or kill moth and caterpillar pests. Examples include Bt potatoes, Bt corn and Bt cotton |
Increased crop resistance to herbicides |
Crops which have herbicide resistance, meaning the crop can be sprayed for weeds without harming the crop. Examples include "round-up ready" canola, "round-up ready" soybeans |
Drought and/or salt resistance |
Using genetic techniques to enhance the water efficiency and salt resistance of crop varieties to decrease need for irrigation, expand agriculture into drier areas and rehabilitate saline soil. Still in the experimental stage |
Increased nutritional or medicinal value |
Producing food crops with higher contents of essential vitamins which can be used to vaccinate against disease. "Golden rice", vitamin A enriched rice (released). Further versions of "golden rice" also include increased iron (undergoing licensing etc). |
Nitrogen fixation |
Producing cereal crops that fix their own nitrogen, which is currently only a trait of legume plants with associated bacteria to fix N. Currently a major experimental effort. Would dramatically reduce the need for N fertilizers and produce cereals with higher protein content, alleviating a major form of malnutrition in developing countries. |
There are a number of major environmental issuses connected to this technology including risk of outcrossing with closely related wild species, risk of crop plants becoming wild and a pest themselves, control over how much land is planted to GMOs by who, and ability to ensure appropriate use and mandatory resistance management (e.g., for pest resistant crops).
Australia currently has very tight regulation of GMO use and resistance management. Whereas control and guidelines in the US and other user countries are not as tightly regulated.
Read the section on genetic engineering in Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 293 – 294 and answer the following questions:
http://www.choice.com.au/ and follow the links through food category and archive articles to get information on GM foods
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/15727/story.htm
There are thousands of other Web sites addressing GMO crops, take a look.
One of the major criticisms against the ability of genetic engineering to solve the world's food problem is that those that require more food and more affordable food are not receiving the benefits of GMOs.
The majority of GMO crops are grown in developed countries, which do not have a problem with providing enough food for their populations, e.g., United States, Canada and some in Australia. Where genetically modified crops are used in developing countries, such as Argentina they are predominately used to produce cash crops and the seed is too expensive for local or peasant farmers to afford.
In addition to the expense of the seed, terminator genes prevent the seed produce one year from being collected and saved for use the next season. This saving of seed is an important aspect of traditional farming that reduces costs and allows the farmer to save seed from superior producing plants, thereby increasing the genetic quality of his crop. Instead farmers have to buy new seed each year.
On top of the expense of seed, GMO crops often do not perform better than traditional crop varieties unless they are provided with optimum nutrition, pest control and water. These are also expensive inputs that limit the practical use of GMOs to increase food production for local farmers in developing countries.
Irrigating a greater proportion of agricultural land is often proposed as a means of increasing agricultural production. Irrigation certainly increases the yield per hectare; about 40% of the world's food production comes from the 18% of the world's cropland that is irrigated (Miller 2005).
However, irrigated land per person has decreased. Factors contributing to this tread include;
There are three key methods for using water more sustainably in crop production
Please refer to the water resources module for further information on irrigation in agriculture.
Theoretically the world's cropland could be more that doubled by clearing tropical forests and irrigating arid land. However, much of this land is marginal and converting it to cropland would not be sustainable and would
In addition to this much of the potential agricultural land in savanna and semi arid Africa is home to 22 species of tsetse fly, which transmit a protozoan parasite that causes incurable sleeping sickness in humans and fatal diseases in livestock.
Large scale increases in irrigation in Australia and Africa would require large-scale and expensive dam projects, large inputs of fossil fuels and extensive works to prevent soil erosion, ground water contamination, salinisation and water-logging, which all reduce crop productivity. The negative environmental effects of increasing irrigation would include;
Briefly read over Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 295 – 296 and answer the following questions
Many well-respected and influential expert commentators have presented strong optimistic and pessimistic views on the ability of the Earth to provide enough food for our increasing population.
In this section we will consider the key points of each of these arguments from an agricultural and ecosystem services perspective rather than a population debate perspective (refer to the population module). It is important to note that although most of the data used to support the optimistic view in Table 1 is from Lomborg's book The Skeptical Environmentalist, this is not the only source that supports these ideas.
Open Table 1 in the attached Word document. Use Miller & Spoolman (2009) with additional references to complete the missing arguments in the following Table.
(Internal Students, please note this exercise will be discussed in the tutorial class).
http://www.fao.org/ag/ Have a look at the articles that are listed down the centre of this page for information to support many of these points
http://www.worldwatch.org/taxonomy/term/98 Have a look at some of the press releases etc. from Worldwatch Institute for information to support many of these points
Lomborg (2001) The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World, Cambridge University Press (available in CDU Library) http://www.lomborg.com/
As discussed in the previous sections of this module the two major ways to increase agricultural production are to increase crop yields and/or increase the amount of land used to grow crops.
Read Miller & Spoolman (2012) pages 304 – 314, and answer the following questions: