In this module, we will discuss the:
In the last 60 seconds, the human population on Earth increased by ~165 people.
That’s equivalent to 1.7 million people per week. Many people contend that population size and growth are the root of all environmental problems, causing environmental damage and depleting resources. However, as we’ll discuss later, this is a matter of intense debate. Three major views have been proposed (Aplin et al. 1999).
The neo-Malthusian view
Probably the most high profile exponent of the neo-Malthusian approach in recent times is Professor Paul Ehlrich from Stanford University in the USA. He has argued that continued population growth will exhaust resource supplies due to resource use. With his colleagues, he proposed the following model to explain how three factors - population, affluence and technology - affect the environmental impact of population.
There are many critics of the neo-Malthusian approach. A current and high profile critic is Bjorn Lomborg, who published the book The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World in 2001 (available in CDU library). You can visit his web site and read an extract of the book at , or read a brief statement of the book's intentions
You can see how much anger his views have raised amongst some environmentalists by going to the anti-Lomborg site at http://www.mylinkspage.com/lomborg.html
Surfing the (world wide web) WWW locates many other sites critical of the neo-Malthusian approach.
Throughout this unit, we will try to consider the various approaches in the debate over the causes of environmental damage.
In this module, we start by considering the human population.