Fire management is a complicated and contested activity. There simply is no ideal fire regime that suits all management goals. For this reason, fire management strategies have to be flexible, inclusive and adaptive. The consequences of past management decisions need to be constantly reviewed. This information should then be used to inform ongoing and future management decisions.
Each fire management decision has costs and benefits. Who burns, why do they burn (or decide not to burn), and when do they do so? What are the points of conflict between people? We will focus on three groups of land managers – Indigenous people, pastoral land managers and conservation and biodiversity managers. Bearing in mind that these three groups may have overlapping membership or objectives, their approaches to ‘management’ and differing values and constructions of landscape may be summarised as follows:
These are over simplified summaries of complex positions, but serve to highlight the fact that different groups may have different motivations and goals for fire management and consequently create different burning regimes.
What are the options for engaging these groups in decision-making for fire management? There is a growing literature on community engagement, capacity building and cross-cultural engagement for natural resource management.
There is also a growing number of community based projects exploring models for improved fire management. You will be introduced to examples from northern Australia and eastern Indonesia that involve collaborations between community members, agencies and researchers.
In the following materials you will be asked to address the following three issues:
There are no simple answers to the question of fire management. You will be directed to resources, and you will have to evaluate the situation for yourself in whatever fire management setting you find yourself in the future.